(2009-2011) Quadruple Helix Central Baltic

Quadruple Helix Central Baltic was an Interreg IV project focusing on gender equality, entrepreneurship and ICT innovations.
It ran from October 2009 until December 2011 and had eight partners from three countries. The name, Quadruple Helix Central Baltic, derives from our working model where four sectors of society i.e public authorities, researchers, entrepreneurs and civil society actors, have come together to strenghten the central Baltic Sea area.

Quadruple Helix reports

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:7 (swedish)

Quadruple Helix som metod för att främja kvinnors företagande

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:6

Documentaion of Study visits within the Quadruple project and
Benchlearning report

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:5

Empowering women’s entrepreneurship – to establish bottom-up innovation systems. The case of cycling tourism in Norrtälje region.

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:4

Dissemination conference 29-30 August 2011, Kärdla, Hiiumaa

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:3

A Gender Equal Cluster initiative – practical experiences from the Quadruple Helix project.

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:2

Bridging the gender gap in entrepreneurship through NGO’s. A study of a Quadruple Helix innovation system project in the Baltic Sea region

Quadruple Helix reports 2011:1

A Study of the Conditions for Women’s Entrepreneurship in the Estonian Entrepreneurial Environment

Quadruple Helix reports 2010:6

A framework for the integration of a gender perspecitve in cross-border entrepreneurship and cluster promotion programmes.

Quadruple Helix reports 2010:5

The gender and entrepreneurship gap in Estonia, Finland and Sweden

Quadruple Helix reports 2010:4

The role of NGOs in supporting women’s entrepreneurship. A study of a Quadruple Helix project in the Baltic sea region.

Quadruple Helix reports 2010:3

Notions of gender in contextual interviews. Workpackage report.

Quadruple Helix reports 2010:2

Cluster promotion and mobile services for the tourism industry.
Seminar report.

Quadruple Helix reports 2010:1

Women, Innovation, Social networking. Search conference report.

QH app MobiTourist Now available on both iPhone and Android devices

Quadruple Helix app MobiTourist: discover Turku Archipelago, Roslagen and West Estonia is now available on both AppStore (iPhone) and Google Market (Android).

The iPhone app is available online at the following link: http://goo.gl/dlfbt

You can get a iPhone app QR Code to print and share at the following link: http://goo.gl/dlfbt.qr

The Android app is available online at the following link: http://goo.gl/CcqGi

You can get a Andoid app QR Code to print and share at the following link: http://goo.gl/CcqGi.qr

Be aware that URL are case sensitive, if you plan to copy them.

Workshop: How to promote female entrepreneurship and clustering?

Results of their group works were as follows:

Group I

  • Bottom up start. It’s important to know what entrepreneurs need. What do they think is important?
  • Interested parties, actors shall join from the beginning. There were too many ideas and objectives from the beginning, quite unclear
  • ”one spider in the web” –necessary to have a project coordinator, one leader who can push forward everything
  • For support structure – listen to the entrepreneurs
  • It’s important to be more flexible
  • Start from existing platform which should be developed further and then build from there
  • The process should be less bureaucratic

Group II

  • Important to have a common webpage which can serve as a platform. A good example is: www.visitestonia.ee in six languages as well as a mobile guide. This website is a web based platform. Through this platform marketing and clustering is possible. The biggest problem is funding. Sometimes funds can even ”decide” a direction of activities (what you can do and what you can’t do)
  • Example, NGO Läänemaa Tourism – they have a website, local organisations are members of a big Lääme Eesti islands.

The groups came to the conclusion that in all three countries clustering is on different stages. In Estonia: at one location entrepreneurs cooperate with each other. The smaller the place is the more difficult is it with clustering. For example, one hotel is full and a tourist is not directed to another hotel. At another location (Saaremaa), entrepreneurs cooperate with targets but not with each other. At a third location there is a problem to get entrepreneurs’ services. Nature is for tourism but if one wants tourists to come back one should offer them something more than just nature, for example a proper catering (catering is in a bad stage). Entrepreneurs complain that there is no incentive for them to provide their services. Here clustering is essential; entrepreneurs should cooperate with each other (one offers dinner, second –lunch etc).

Workshop: How do we continue the cross border cluster from here?

For successful business one needs customers as they generate the money. Unfortunately, women entrepreneurs in general are not so good in selling to the right price (pricing). But they are good in networking. In order to understand why networking is essential Lena divided the participants at the conference in four working groups and asked them to discuss how they are going to work together and with what.



Initial point for the first group was sightseeing. According to the participants in this group one should focus on events and sightseeing. There can be different cooperation options depending on the type of holiday tourist wishes to spend: yachting, biking, fishing, walking, picking barriers, spa, etc .

On the question how they are going to work they underlined that together they will have strength, information, contacts/networks, added values, and more customers.


The second group focused on cross-border tourism/vacation. They underlined that there is an increased interest in active vacations combined with food experiences and spa. They consider a Jump on-off possibility as the most suitable option for their target groups. The desirable target groups would consist of ten persons. They believe that the Quadruple app is a means to efficient and easy marketing for tourists. They also underlined the importance of benchmarking.


The third group believed through the cooperation they will learn about each other and with each other (training, seminars). It’s essential to exchange knowledge, ideas and experience and especially bad experiences. One good idea would be to have a common forum or council for improvement of ideas. They should promote each other’s business which will lead to more income. Lobbing was also considered as a part of success.


The forth group concluded that networking is important for sharing customers. They considered rich people as main customers as from an Estonian perspective the middle-class can’t afford travelling in three countries during one holiday. Another group of customers could be people with a very specific interest (for example photographing). The target group might be from other countries than the Quadruple regions, for instance Germany, USA, Holland etc.


For successful business the following is needed:

  • Coaching in each country
  • Strong cooperation
  • Good website
  • build upon the MobiTourist app
  • Experience exchange
  • Trainings, seminars and discussions
  • Common packages
  • Common products
  • Something concrete to build the networking and clustering on

A study of the conditions for women’s entrepreneurship in the Estonian Entrepreneurial environment

The backgrounds of the women were very different (turnover of the companies, experience and age of entrepreneurs, branch, etc). For the methodology, a qualitative method with semi-structured interviews were used. All interviews were recorded and documented. In addition, data from the Statistical Office, results from studies carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs, and other various studies that examine women’s entrepreneurship in Estonia were used. The methodology was framed by the project partner: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).

The study showed that the question of gender equality is not very important for Estonian female entrepreneurs as opportunities for starting up own business are felt to be the same for everyone, regardless of their gender.

One of the reasons for this perceived attitude is that not a particular sex but rather independence, activity, desire and social skills are required for an entrepreneur to be successful. Basically, it’s an entrepreneur him/herself who can create attractive conditions for business. In rural areas there are many female entrepreneurs and the share of male labour is considerably higher only in agriculture and construction.

The educational level of Estonian women in rural areas is higher than men, but their economic activity is still lower. Female share in entrepreneurship is estimated to one third of all entrepreneurs.

According to the study one of the incentives for starting up an enterprise is often dissatisfaction with a former job or time management. The interviewed women declared a wish to control their own time, determine their own conditions for activities and/or be free in their decisions.

The share of activity fields which have traditionally been considered feminine is high among retailing, training and consultation services, beauty treatment services, healthcare, accommodation, catering and tourism.

In Estonia activities of enterprises that involve women entrepreneurs are more often oriented towards the domestic market; women entrepreneurs are rarely involved in import and export. Estonian women entrepreneurs are oriented towards cooperation if they can gain something out of it but won’t consider being a member of a network without gaining anything because of lack of time.

Of the 23 interviewees, only three women entrepreneurs had experienced discrimination or seen it from the side.

As a conclusion of this study Anneli underlined that no considerable gender inequality is perceived in the Estonian entrepreneurial environment by the interviewees. However it exists on a structural level.

Quadruple Helix as a method to promote women’s entrepreneurship

In the project:

Introducing/highlighting the role of NGOs in women’s entrepreneurship development by putting a Quadruple Helix model into practical use.

A typical practical support structure model is a Triple Helix-thinking:


In the Nordic countries this method has used very much. In number of countries this spin is powerful.

The SME –blind Triple Helix clearly shows interaction between different actors:

In practice, government and academia can collaborate, but when they focus on industries they support dominating industries (located in towns, high-tech, growth- businesses). Small businesses, business for survival (service) and rural industries are neglected.

To go towards Quadruple Helix logic we shall include civil society. But what will the role of the civil society be? Can NGOs be considered as the 4th Helix? The Quadruple mode is very new, so far there are few experiences. One example is a study made by the Woman Resource Centres (Malin Lindberg ) – bifocal approach intended to increase women participation in regional development). Here it was mentioned first and from here started an Empirical case: the Quadruple Helix Central Baltic project.


As for the ”Government” from the model we have in the project: Stockholm County Administrative Board (SE), Municipality of Norrtälje (SE), Väståbolands stad (FI), Destination Roslagen (SE), Intermunicipal collaborative organization. ”Academia” in the project is represented by: Saaremaae University Centre (EE) – entrepreneurship research; KTH – Royal Institute of Technology (SE) – Innovation and Gender research and, Åbo Akademi University (FI) – Gender and ICP research. As for the ”Industry”: E-teams, regional teams of entrepreneurs collaborating in Estonia, Finland and Sweden, Local subcontractors and technology providers in Estonia, Finland and Sweden. Finally, the ”Civil society” is represented by: BalticFem(SE) – NGO organising local femal entrepreneurs SE; Eurohouse (EE) NGO organizing local female entrepreneurs; Läänemaa Tourism (EE) – local tourism association.

There have been various research activities undertaken, such as: workshops, study visits, dialogue seminars, E-teams project work, interview studies on conditions for female entrepreneurs to understand how they work in Finland, Estonia and Sweden.

What we have seen so far are that NGOs have four roles.

Role 1: NGOs as collaborative platforms

Activities: NGOs enable non‐hierarchical networking, business collaboration nodes; it is a good incubator for start of a cluster; arena for trustful communication and information exchange; carrier of common goals and values.

Challenges: Short‐term financing despite long‐term needs (gender inequalities exist for thousand of years, so we can’t solve the problem in two years); difficult trade-off for individual business owners between collaborating and running their own firm.

→ Cluster formation is not an easy matter!

Role 2: NGOs as legitimating link for other three actors (government, academia, industry)

Activities: Promoting gender mainstreaming in legislation and business support services; linking small businesses to authorities and academic institutions.

Challenges: Questioned legitimacy due to informal practices and being ’women’s’ organizations’ (specific interest, focusing just on women is not good); seen as competing with governmental structures. Lack of local legitimacy (in specific municipality they can have problem). Problems of creating linkages to academic organizations (links are not always needed, what is needed instead are well trained workers in particular business rather than laboratory tests).

Role 3: NGOs as host organisations for competence development and process innovations

Activities: Competence development (organising common trainings) and process innovations related to firm categories usually excluded in Triple Helix systems.

Challenges: Innovations not directly transformable into commercial products and services not valued by other helices. By other words, if we innovate something it cannot always be regarded as an innovation that can be sold on the market, so maybe it won’t be interesting in the same way as an innovation of a product.

Role 4: NGOs carrying individual and societal dimensions

Activities: Promoting bifocal approaches emphasising gender change as both individual and structural.

Challenges: Individual and structural aspects of women’s entrepreneurship seen as controversial and irrelevant in business communities.

So, we can define a role for the civil society:


Annika Skoglund has followed the work in Roslagen and the Swedish Entrepreneur Team which can be called a Quadruple Helix process in practice.

She described the work that took place during winter and spring 2011: In the established E-team network the idea of creating a new biking path that could unite the enterprises in the project was born. In February 2011 the work process started, there were discussions about how to do a mobile application for a biking path. A need for a database with information was highlighted and cooperation with Destination Roslagen started in order to share information from the web page Roslagen.se and the database behind it. Preparation of maps and brochures became actual; a workshop was held in order to discuss a Business Plan for a biking path idea.

In this specific workshop eleven participants (eight entrepreneurs) participated. It became a ”real thing” to connect the entrepreneurs in the abstract network via a biking path and create joint travel packages. Also a few more entrepreneurs who had previously tried to create bicycle packages joined the project and the E‐team group. They all formed one group.

The members of the group decided to cooperate with each other. Project management made entrepreneurs work. Benchmarking of ideas was undertaken. Cooperation with Destination Roslagen started and it became obvious that new information was required for the database ”Basetool”. The question whether the app was enough or not rose. Entrepreneurs were of the opinion that also a paper map was needed, something that tourists could look at directly. So collaboration started and a common graphical profile was designed. The bicycle map was seen as an important tool for promotion, something that could be shown to create interest about cycling tourism in Roslagen. But the problem was who would pay for the map and for what. Financial negotiation started and it showed that advertisements could be one way of financing the map.


A first workshop was organized and Lena Norrman lead it as a moderator. She was teaching participants who could be probable advertisers and sponsors. Local specialities were discussed and participants got homework: what can you offer TOGETHER as a network?


During the second workshop uniqueness was discussed. Ten participants (eight entrepreneurs) attended the workshop. Participants had to think of pleasures that could be offered to tourists. Homework focused on two aspects: What pleasures have we forgotten? Who are our customers?


The number of participants increased and reached 13 (eleven entrepreneurs). The discussion focused on details of the biking paths. It was decided to exclude Rimbo as there was no participant from that area. Among other issues participants talked about information that had to be present on Google maps, paper maps, brochures etc. Legal issues were also discussed.


The network participated at the Archipelago fair which was held in Stockholm. The expo had one fee for groups and another fee for individual participants. As a network they had to pay only one fee and it was positively received. At the fair they sold different packages (Bike rentals, B&B, attractions, food experiences, etc). It was also possible to make individual packages. The selling point was Roslagen as beautiful and non‐explored area.

At this stage Annika made interviews with entrepreneurs. She had long conversations and realized that the map and the produced brochure made them very positive towards the project. It was also the start of the season. Next mission was to attract tourists. Entrepreneurs had a common aim: to get tourists to stay in region, not just to use bike path. In order to keep them entrepreneurs were recommending the next hotel, the next B&B. Thus, they started helping each other.

The interview study showed that the entrepreneurs were positive about project management and the network but they lacked time. They were positive towards the technology (app) but they were waiting for it. They had a pricing agreement for the package tours, having same price to the customer although the standard between B&B:s and hostels varied. The group agreed to offer same type of service to the guests, such as luggage transportation and ”rent here, leave there” (collaborative approach). Everything showed that they wanted to work together, and not compete. They saw each other as back-up (”if one of our bikes break”) and were focused on keeping a tourist longer in the region. These are positive outcomes of the project.


  • The interest of the entrepreneurs
    1. Interest
    2. Participation
    3. Contribution
  • Change of owners
  • ”With time we found our different roles” (it’s important not to say what they shall do, they find their own roles)


Many women had this business as a part-time job. There is a big difference between an entrepreneur who inherited a business (for example a property for B&B) and an entrepreneur who started from scratch.


If we use a Quadruple Helix thinking one can see relations between all four actors and their respective roles/functions in the project:

Industry (E-teams, Package co, Destination Roslagen, Local subcontractors)

• Members in network (network venturing); • Initiative of common objective; • Tourism and ICT; • Business strategy; • Service growth; • Support each other

Government (Municipality of Norrtälje, Stockholm County Administrative Board)

• Initiative; • Tourism and ICT (bridge gender but not balance); • Financing; • Service innovation; • Support; • ”Glue” in the network; • Promotion

Academia (Saaremaa University, KTH, Åbo Akademi University)

• Education; • Gender awareness; • Policy proposals; • Reporting; • Academic publishing; • Project feedback; • Internal critical process

Civil society (BalticFem)

• Ideological aim; • Increase women’s entrepreneurship by business support; • Technical development; • Informational material; • Tight contact with the

municipality; • Implicitly inform about structures; • Promote to the old ”hawks”


  • Initiative acknowledged (financing, reputation)
  • Success common objective ‐ the map and broschure(business)
  • Project management (structure)
  • Entrepreneur selling packages (direction)
  • Networks already in place (adaptability)
  • A way of living (engagement)
  • From policy to business to long term cooperation


  • Gender awareness only implicit
  • ”There is no difference being a female entrepreneur” (financial support, administrative support)
  • Too many networks


  • Improve the project by the app
  • Improve the sales channels
  • Improve gender awareness (NGO and entrepreneur interface)
  • Benchmark more internally in the network (boat path)


  • Cooperative practices
  • Kärlekskraft” (Jonasdottir, ”Love-power”, it’s a typical female phenomena, women are more cooperative than men. Many women are happy to give love to customers)
  • Local networks
  • Political limitations

Launch of the Quadruple MobiTourist mobile application and website

Ole Bergen, Åbo Akademi University, Finland

OleBergenpresappenOle made a visualisation of the MobiTourist app:

At first one should choose a country of interest which leads to a Google map. A user can choose among different categories: accommodation, food, sightseeing, events, activities, shopping, etc. By clicking on desirable option the user gets information about it and can even see the distance to that object. In case of events calendar is used instead of the distance indicator showing when the particular event takes place.

When the project is finished the application can be downloaded without costs. However, someone has to maintain it. Ole underlined that it has been hard to get tourist entrepreneurs to understand the possibilities the apps will give to them. But those E- teams who have been active and saw different possibilities have also been really positive.


Denna webbplats använder cookies. Genom att fortsätta använda denna sida accepterar du vår användning av cookies.   Lär dig mer